Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02178
Original file (BC 2013 02178.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:		DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-02178
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

She be allowed to transfer her Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of 
Educational Benefits (TEB) to her dependents.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

When she extended her enlistment in 2011 it was for the 
expressed purpose of transferring her benefits.  She was unaware 
that she needed to sign a Statement of Understanding (SOU).  She 
thought all actions were completed when she signed the paperwork 
for her extension.

In support of the applicant’s appeal, she provides a copy of AF 
Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment 
in the Regular Air Force (REGAF) Air Force Reserve (AF RESERVE) 
Air National Guard (ANG) and the Post 9/11 GI Bill Transfer of 
Education Benefits SOU

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________
_

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade 
of master sergeant.

Any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009, who, 
at the time of the approval of the individual's request to 
transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this 
section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, has at least 
6 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or 
Selected Reserve) on the date of election and agrees to serve a 
specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of 
election.




The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, 
extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained 
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air 
Force at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________
_

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial.  DPSIT states the applicant called 
the Total Force Service Center (TFSC) on 28 April 2011 inquiring 
on the status of the TEB.  The applicant also had to apply 
through MilConnect, which states that “Your transfer request is 
not final until you digitally sign AF Form 4406 (Post 9/11 GI 
Bill Transfer of Education Benefits Statement of Understanding) 
in VMPF.  The applicant never completed this action.  Therefore, 
the TEB application was rejected on 9 May 2011 by the TFSC.  The 
applicant did not inquire again on the status of the TEB 
application until she submitted the AFBCMR request in May 2013.

The DPSIT complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 31 May 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit 
C).  As of this date, no response has been received by this 
office. 

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  The 
applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, we agree with 
the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for 
our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an 
error or injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to 
the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________
_


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

________________________________________________________________
_

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-02178 in Executive Session on 12 March 2014, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


The following documentary evidence was considered:

  Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 1 May 2013, w/atchs.
  Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 20 May 2013, w/atch.
  Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 May 2013.




2


3



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04365

    Original file (BC 2013 04365.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of her request the applicant provides copies of her AF Form 4406, Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits Statement of Understanding (SOU) and AF Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force (REGAF) Air Force Reserve (AF Reserve) Air National Guard (ANG). Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) who meets Post- 9/11 GI Bill eligibility requirements and at the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02830

    Original file (BC 2013 02830.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: On 17 Jan 12, she applied to transfer her Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to her dependents; however, on 30 Jan 12, her application was rejected because she did not complete and return the Statement of Understanding (SOU). In addition, when the applicant applied through MilConnect there was a “Message from your Service Component” displayed, which states “Your transfer request is not final until you...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03064

    Original file (BC 2013 03064.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted the application to transfer the Post-9/11 GI Bill on 18 January 2011. The SOU was never received. The applicant was sent an email on 19 January 2011 requesting his signature on the SOU.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05219

    Original file (BC 2013 05219.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Transferability of unused benefits to dependents: • Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on or after 1 August 2009 who meets Post-9/11 GI Bill eligibility requirements and at the time of the approval of the member’s request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance the member meets one of the following: o Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve, NOAA Corps, or PHS) on the date of application and agrees...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04006

    Original file (BC-2012-04006.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. By the time she completed the process to extend on active duty, signed the SOU, and received approval for TEB she had an outstanding...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03431

    Original file (BC 2013 03431.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Once he was notified, he immediately requested and filed for the date of his service commitment to be adjusted to the original request date. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. Prior to accessing the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00189

    Original file (BC 2014 00189.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) website, it notifies the applicants that their transfer request is not final until the SOU is digitally signed in the Virtual Military Personnel Flight (vMPF). On 12 Oct 10, an email was sent to the applicant informing her that her application for TEB had expired because she did not sign the SOU. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01734

    Original file (BC-2012-01734.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He knew there was a four year ADSC with the transfer but was completely unaware there was a form to sign at the time of submission for approval. He was sent an email on 13 Jun 2011 requesting he sign and return the SOU. He has served 17 years of service in the United States Air Force and as an officer takes integrity very seriously.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03459

    Original file (BC 2014 03459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The message states in part: "Within 72 hours you will receive an Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) email with "TEB INCIDENT" in the subject line, stating that your AF Form 4406 is ready for signature. The date on the SOU provided by the applicant reads “9/6/2011”. The applicant did not complete the TEB SOU and therefore his 20 May 11 TEB application could not be approved.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05233

    Original file (BC 2013 05233.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    * If the member has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election and agrees to serve four additional years in the Air Force from the date of request, regardless of the number of months transferred, or * has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either Air Force policy, DoD policy or statute from committing to four additional years (HYT,...